All One Body Counters The Human Sexuality Report

In 2016 the Synod of the Christian Reformed Church mandated that a committee needed to produce a full-scoped report on human sexuality. The committee would be given five years, given the magnitude of the study. In October of 2020 that report was released to the churches.

In response to that report the organization All One Body produced a number of videos responding to the human sexuality report. The following will be critiques of the All One Body videos. Each evaluation has an associated blog for visitors to comment on the pros and cons.

.

CONCLUSIONS CONCERNING THESE ALL ONE BODY VIDEOS

Our conclusions concerning these videos are presented here so that visitors can review them and then see if they are accurately drawn from the videos. If errors are found in these conclusions, please submit them to us so that they can be added to these web pages and other visitors can benefit from them as well. Thank you.

.

BIBLICAL-THEOLOGICAL CONCERNS

CONCLUSION: THESE OBJECTIONS ARE NOT VALID

Why the conclusion is given first.1

Eight Objections to the Human Sexuality Report – Dr. Art Jongsma

What About Romans 1? Dr. Art Jongsma

Not A Set Of Rules – Rev. Rich Braaksma

Missing The Point – Rev. Rich Braaksma

Context Is King – Mr. Nickolas Hopkins

Not So Clear – Rev. David Vroege

A Devotional Response – Dr. Rodger Rice

The Church of Nevertheless . . . – Rev. Keith Mannes

Creation vs. Nature – Dr. Aron Reppmann

Reflections – Rev. Al Mulder

.

SCIENTIFIC CONCERNS

CONCLUSION ON SCIENTIFIC CONCERNS

Why the conclusion is given first.1

Integrating Revelation – Mr. Don Huizinga

Misuse of Research – Dr. Emily Helder

Intersex and Transgender – Dr. Loren Haarsma

Variant or Defect – Dr. Naranjo-Huebl

.

LGBTQ+ CONCERNS

CONCLUSION CONCERNING LGBTQ+ CONCERNS

Why the conclusion is given first.1

Harm to Trans Christians – Thomas Hare

Using the Bible to Oppress – Jessica Jelsema

What’s the Harm – Julia Smith

Bearing Your Burden – Nicholas Hopkins

.

CONFESSIONAL CONCERNS

CONCLUSION OF CONFESSIONAL CONCERNS SECTION

HSR’s Flawed Claim – Rev. Paul Verhoef

Ursinus’s Use of Unchastity – Dr. James Payton

RCA’s LGBTQ+ Decision – Dr. James Payton

Committee Membership – Rev. Leonard Vander Zee

.

PASTORAL CONCERNS

CONCLUSION: PASTORAL CONCERNS

Discounting and Not Listening – Dr. Karl Van Harn

List of Sexual Sins vs. Grace – Rev. Duane Kelderman

HSR Lacks Pastoral Advice – Dr. Steve Timmermans

The Boundless Love of God – Dr. Thomas Hoeksema

Some Observations

.

OTHER

CONCLUSION OF THIS SECTION

Five Major Concerns – Rev. Paul Verhoef

Dr. Nicholas Wolterstorff

Classis Grand Rapids East Report of 2016

.

1 Conclusions are positioned above the individual videos which they form a conclusion for in keeping with the “top down” format of this website. By top down is meant these conclusions present deductions which we have arrived at having examined each of the videos in that group. The reader is then invited to review our conclusions and take a look at the individual videos to see what her or his conclusions are. Readers are invited to send us their insights in the event they arrive at conclusions which differ from those presented here. Those insights will be considered for addition to this material.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *