Variant or Defect?

Subtitle: A case arguing intersex is a creational variant and not a defect resulting from the fall.

By Dr. Linda Naranjo-Huebl

.

Statement Against Heterosexual Marriages Only

Statement

Gender variance is a direct challenge to the report.

Naranjo-Huebl cites a work by Megan DeFranza that claims gender variance is a creational variance, not a result of the fall.

No Scriptural or scientific definitions of what constitutes male and female exist.

Gender variance is a creational variant, not a disorder.

.

Response

Dr. Naranjo-Huebl provides a certain statement concerning gender variance being a creational variance. The video clearly provides more than is listed above in the Statement. The items listed here have been chosen as specific statements to be considered further. The book by DeFranza is the only support she cites for this concept. Upon examining that book, it was learned that creational variant or variance is not even mentioned in that book. How can a concept be described and supported if it is not mentioned?

Naranjo-Huebl also states in her video that there is no scriptural definition of what it means to be male and female. Is that correct? Lev. 18:22 states, “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.” Isn’t that a biblical statement of what it means to be a male? If a male is not to lie with a male, isn’t that a definition of what it means to be a male? Similarly, Rom. 1:26-27 states that for men to give up natural relations with women and engage in shameless acts with men, that is not acceptable. Men engaging in sex with men is not what men are to do. I Cor. 6:9-10 states that homosexuals will not inherit the kingdom of God. Once again, men engaging in sex with men is contrary to what it means to be a man.

The topic of creational variant is taken up further in the webpage covering the video of Dr. Haarsma.  

One reply on “Variant or Defect?”

Dr. Naranjo-Huebl assertions conflict with what evolutionist see as the primary engine of evolution: death and sexual differentiation. Sexual reproduction, in this view, allows species to gain advantage by having stronger, smarter pairs compete for the opportunity to mate, thus transferring their “selected” traits to the next generation. Yet, it appears that Dr. Naranjo-Huebl considers human beings an exception to this hard and fast fact of evolution. Evolution is not particularly kind. What will not mate and reproduce becomes extinct.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *